From
Japan you can also send money to

Sending money from JAPAN to VIETNAM
JPY
|
USD
Payment instrument
Access point
Sending network coverage
Transfer speed
<em>Transfer Speed</em> has been standardized in six broad categories.
Receiving method
Exchange rate margin (%)
The exchange rate margin is the cost resulting from the fact that the firm applies a rate that is different from the market reference rate. The margin is the percentage difference between the market reference rate and the exchange rate actually applied to the transaction.
Total cost (%)
The total cost of sending a remittance transfer includes: the fee charged to the sender plus the exchange rate margin.
Total cost (JPY)
Total cost (USD)


The total cost of sending a remittance transfer includes: the fee charged to the sender plus the exchange rate margin.
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

Medium
200.002.35
0.62
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.74 and exchange rate charged 175.640.621.801.80
306.003.60
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
390.004.59
0.05
Percentage difference between market reference rate 173.19 and exchange rate charged 173.100.052.352.35
399.504.70
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
407.064.79
-0.01
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.75 and exchange rate charged 176.77-0.012.382.38
404.604.76
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
390.004.59
0.53
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 177.700.532.832.83
481.105.66
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
390.004.59
0.53
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 177.700.532.832.83
481.105.66
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
390.004.59
0.53
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 177.700.532.832.83
481.105.66
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
390.004.59
0.84
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.60 and exchange rate charged 177.100.843.133.13
532.106.26
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.71
0.87
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.55 and exchange rate charged 177.000.873.223.22
547.406.44
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.71
0.90
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.12 and exchange rate charged 177.500.903.263.26
554.206.52
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.71
0.90
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.12 and exchange rate charged 177.500.903.263.26
554.206.52
Payment instrument

Access point
Call Center
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.71
0.90
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.12 and exchange rate charged 177.500.903.263.26
554.206.52
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
460.005.41
0.83
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.68 and exchange rate charged 177.200.833.543.54
601.807.08
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

High
490.005.76
0.77
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.74 and exchange rate charged 175.380.773.653.65
620.507.30
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
480.005.65
1.11
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 176.671.113.933.93
668.107.86
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

High
490.005.76
1.17
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.74 and exchange rate charged 174.671.174.054.05
688.508.10
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
590.006.94
0.98
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.86 and exchange rate charged 177.100.984.454.45
756.508.90
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
599.007.05
1.22
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.18 and exchange rate charged 177.001.224.744.74
805.809.48
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
1,500.0017.65
1.29
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.48 and exchange rate charged 176.181.2910.1110.11
1,718.7020.22
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
3,000.0035.29
2.75
Percentage difference between market reference rate 0.01 and exchange rate charged 0.012.7520.4020.40
3,468.0040.80
Total Average Fourth Quarter 2022
4.534.53
Total Average Third Quarter 2022
5.305.30
Total Average
Fee
619.277.29Exchange Rate Margin (%)
0.880.88Total Cost Percent (%)
4.534.53
Total Cost (JPY)
Total Cost (USD)
769.659.05








Payment instrument
Access point
Sending network coverage
Receiving method
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

Medium
200.002.38
0.62
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.74 and exchange rate charged 175.640.621.101.10
462.005.50
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
629.007.49
0.05
Percentage difference between market reference rate 173.19 and exchange rate charged 173.100.051.551.55
651.007.75
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
681.568.11
-0.01
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.75 and exchange rate charged 176.77-0.011.611.61
676.208.05
Payment instrument

Access point
Call Center
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.76
0.90
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.12 and exchange rate charged 177.500.901.861.86
781.209.30
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.76
0.90
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.12 and exchange rate charged 177.500.901.861.86
781.209.30
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
400.004.76
0.90
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.12 and exchange rate charged 177.500.901.861.86
781.209.30
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
460.005.48
0.83
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.68 and exchange rate charged 177.200.831.931.93
810.609.65
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
629.007.49
0.53
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 177.700.532.032.03
852.6010.15
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
629.007.49
0.53
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 177.700.532.032.03
852.6010.15
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
629.007.49
0.53
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 177.700.532.032.03
852.6010.15
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

High
600.007.14
0.77
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.74 and exchange rate charged 175.380.772.202.20
924.0011.00
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
480.005.71
1.11
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.65 and exchange rate charged 176.671.112.252.25
945.0011.25
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

High
490.005.83
1.17
Percentage difference between market reference rate 176.74 and exchange rate charged 174.671.172.342.34
982.8011.70
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
880.0010.48
0.84
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.60 and exchange rate charged 177.100.842.932.93
1,230.6014.65
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
1,000.0011.90
0.87
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.55 and exchange rate charged 177.000.873.253.25
1,365.0016.25
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
1,080.0012.86
0.98
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.86 and exchange rate charged 177.100.983.553.55
1,491.0017.75
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
999.0011.89
1.22
Percentage difference between market reference rate 179.18 and exchange rate charged 177.001.223.603.60
1,512.0018.00
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
1,500.0017.86
1.29
Percentage difference between market reference rate 178.48 and exchange rate charged 176.181.294.864.86
2,041.2024.30
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
3,000.0035.71
2.75
Percentage difference between market reference rate 0.01 and exchange rate charged 0.012.759.899.89
4,153.8049.45
Total Average Fourth Quarter 2022
2.782.78
Total Average Third Quarter 2022
3.103.10
Total Average
Fee
794.039.45Exchange Rate Margin (%)
0.880.88Total Cost Percent (%)
2.782.78
Total Cost (JPY)
Total Cost (USD)
1,165.6113.88








Least Costly Corridors To Vietnam
Least Costly Corridors From Japan