De
Noruega você também pode enviar dinheiro para

O envio de dinheiro de NORUEGA para OMAN
NOK
|
USD
Payment instrument
Access point
Sending network coverage
Transfer speed
<em>A rapidez da transferência</em> foi padronizada em seis categorias amplas.
Receiving method
Exchange rate margin (%)
The exchange rate margin is the cost resulting from the fact that the firm applies a rate that is different from the market reference rate. The margin is the percentage difference between the market reference rate and the exchange rate actually applied to the transaction.
Total cost (%)
O custo total do envio de uma transferência de remessa inclui: a taxa cobrada do remetente mais a margem da taxa de câmbio.
Total cost (NOK)
Total cost (USD)


O custo total do envio de uma transferência de remessa inclui: a taxa cobrada do remetente mais a margem da taxa de câmbio.
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method


Medium
0.000.00
0.43
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.770.430.430.43
5.330.86
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
0.000.00
1.22
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.641.221.221.22
15.132.44
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
0.000.00
1.39
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.611.391.391.39
17.242.78
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
0.000.00
1.79
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.541.791.791.79
22.203.58
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method


High
29.004.68
0.25
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.800.252.582.58
31.995.16
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
19.993.22
1.44
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.601.443.053.05
37.826.10
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
0.000.00
3.29
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.293.293.293.29
40.806.58
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
20.003.23
2.21
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.472.213.833.83
47.497.66
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
60.009.68
-0.82
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.98-0.824.024.02
49.858.04
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method


High
32.005.16
1.66
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.561.664.244.24
52.588.48
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
60.009.68
0.26
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.800.265.105.10
63.2410.20
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
49.007.90
1.34
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.621.345.295.29
65.6010.58
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
60.009.68
1.02
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.671.025.865.86
72.6611.72
Payment instrument


Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

High
60.009.68
1.91
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.521.916.756.75
83.7013.50
Payment instrument

Access point
Bank branch, Call Center, Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
60.009.68
2.20
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.472.207.047.04
87.3014.08
Média total Quarto trimestre 2020
3.733.73
Média total Terceiro trimestre 2020
3.983.98
Média total
Taxa
30.004.84Margem da taxa de câmbio (%)
1.311.31Percentual do Custo Total (%)
3.733.73
Porcentagem Custo Total (NOK)
Porcentagem Custo Total (USD)
46.207.45












Payment instrument
Access point
Sending network coverage
Receiving method
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method


Medium
0.000.00
0.43
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.770.430.430.43
13.332.15
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
0.000.00
1.22
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.641.221.221.22
37.826.10
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
0.000.00
1.39
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.611.391.391.39
43.096.95
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Medium
0.000.00
1.79
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.541.791.791.79
55.498.95
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method


High
0.000.00
0.25
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.800.250.250.25
7.751.25
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
19.993.22
1.44
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.601.442.082.08
64.4810.40
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
N/AN/A
N/A
not availableN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/A
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
20.003.23
2.21
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.472.212.862.86
88.6614.30
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
60.009.68
-0.82
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.98-0.821.111.11
34.415.55
Payment instrument

Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method


High
32.005.16
1.66
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.561.662.692.69
83.3913.45
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
90.0014.52
0.26
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.800.263.173.17
98.2715.85
Payment instrument


Access point
Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
49.007.90
1.34
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.621.342.922.92
90.5214.60
Payment instrument

Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

High
80.0012.90
1.02
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.671.023.603.60
111.6018.00
Payment instrument


Access point
Agent
Sending network coverage
Medium

Receiving method

High
90.0014.52
1.91
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.521.914.814.81
149.1124.05
Payment instrument

Access point
Bank branch, Call Center, Internet
Sending network coverage
High

Receiving method

Low
60.009.68
2.20
Percentage difference between market reference rate 16.84 and exchange rate charged 16.472.204.144.14
128.3420.70
Média total Quarto trimestre 2020
2.322.32
Média total Terceiro trimestre 2020
2.592.59
Média total
Taxa
35.795.77Margem da taxa de câmbio (%)
1.161.16Percentual do Custo Total (%)
2.322.32
Porcentagem Custo Total (NOK)
Porcentagem Custo Total (USD)
71.8811.59












Corredores menos dispendiosos para Oman
Corredores menos dispendiosos de Noruega